Kejaksaan Agung Raids Office and Residence of Ombudsman Commissioner Yeka Hendra
On Sunday afternoon, the National Prosecution Office (Kejagung) carried out searches at the workplace and private residence of Yeka Hendra Fatika, a member of the Indonesian Ombudsman. The action was confirmed by Anang Supriatna, head of the Kejagung’s communication department, who stated, “Yes, YH. The searches were conducted at both the office and her home.”
Background of the Investigation
The raids are linked to allegations of corruption in the management of crude palm oil. Anang mentioned that the case involves a bribery scenario related to the acquittal of three companies—Wilmar Group, Musim Mas Group, and Permata Hijau Group—in the palm oil case. He added, “One of the reasons is the recommendation from the Ombudsman that pointed to administrative malpractice in export policies.”
“He was charged under Article 21 for obstructing the investigation and prosecution of the palm oil case,” said Anang when asked about the connection to the Ombudsman’s recommendation during the corporations’ PTUN litigation.
Impact of the Ombudsman’s Recommendation
The prosecutors argue that the Ombudsman’s report played a role in enabling the corporations to evade legal consequences. According to Anang, the actions of the commissioner are suspected of hindering the judicial process, which led to the companies being freed from liability. The search aims to uncover evidence of potential manipulation in the process.
Details of the Search Operation
The Kejagung team left the Ombudsman building in South Jakarta around 5:10 PM. They carried documents, red shopping bags, and one box, departing in four black vehicles. No public comments were issued following the raid. The operation focuses on the commissioner’s alleged involvement in the case of the acquitted corporations.
The case revolves around the acquittal verdict given to the three companies on March 19, 2025. This decision was supported by a PTUN ruling that favored the corporations. The Ombudsman’s recommendation, which highlighted ‘maladministrasi’ in export policies, became a critical factor in the verdict. Prosecutors suspect that this recommendation was part of a coordinated effort to influence the outcome.
As the investigation unfolds, the Kejagung continues to probe the commissioner’s role in the matter. The search at the Ombudsman’s headquarters and Yeka’s residence marks a significant step in the case, which has sparked discussions about the intersection of administrative recommendations and legal accountability.
